Community and Culture Home | UtahGov Search | PIONEER
Bookmobile | Certification / Consulting | Emergent Literacy | Continuing Ed. | InterLibrary Loan | Spanish Speaking | Statistics | Youth
Services to State Agencies | State Publications
CatExpress | CE Grants | E-rate | LSTA | Community Library Enhancement Fund
Buildings Toolkit | Library Laws & Legislation | Library Organizations | MLIS Educational Resources | Skills Courses | Professional Reading

Performance Review and Development Plans

Picture of two people at a desk conducting a performance review

Performance Review and Development Plans


Please remember to complete QUARTERLY reviews to celebrate your progress and as a reminder should you fall behind on achieving your goals.


Performance Review and Development Plans for FY 2007-2008 must be completed by

May 31,2008

Prior to writing your new plan please refer to Performance Plan Tips provided by the Department of Community and Culture Human Resources Group.


The FY 2009-2009 Employee Goal/Actions (Part III) is also due by May 31, so include your plan to help accomplish our Department Goals during the upcoming year.

Remember to include:

Measurable Goals •Goals reflect the Mission •Goals reflect strategic priorities (reflected in the Balanced ScoreCard) •Goals have timelines•Goals should provide stretch


Review/retrieve a copy of the Utah State Library Division Balanced Scorecard FY2007.

Review/retrieve a copy of the Utah Department of Community and Culture Performance Review FY 2006-2007 and Development Plan FY 2007-2008.


Let us not forget Bob!

Picture of a Man


 

Outcomes-Based Evaluation has become a standard

for Government Agencies and Corporations worldwide.

 

What is Outcomes-Based Evaluation?

 

A Basic Definition

Outcomes evaluation looks at impacts/benefits/changes to your clients (as a result of your program(s) efforts) during and/or after their participation in your programs. Outcomes evaluation can examine these changes in the short-term, intermediate term and long-term.

Basic Components and Key Terms in Outcomes Evaluation

Outcomes evaluation is often described first by looking at its basic components. Outcomes evaluation looks at programs as systems that have inputs, activities/processes, outputs and outcomes -- this system's view is useful in examining any program!
  • Inputs
    These are materials and resources that the program uses in its activities, or processes, to serve clients, eg, equipment, staff, volunteers, facilities, money, etc. These are often easy to identify and many of the inputs seem common to many organizations and programs.
  • Activities
    These are the activities, or processes, that the program undertakes with/to the client in order to meet the clients' needs, for example, teaching, counseling, sheltering, feeding, clothing, etc. Note that when identifying the activities in a program, the focus is still pretty much on the organization or program itself, and still is not so much on actual changes in the client.
  • Outputs
    These are the units of service regarding your program, for example, the number of people taught, counseled, sheltered, fed, clothed, etc. The number of clients served, books published, etc., very often indicates nothing at all about the actual impacts/benefits/changes in your clients who went through the program -- the number of clients served merely indicates the numerical number of clients who went through your program.
  • Outcomes
    These are actual impacts/benefits/changes for participants during or after your program
    -- for example, for a smoking cessation program, an outcome might be "participants quit smoking" (notice that this outcome is quite different than outputs, such as the "number of clients who went through the cessation program")
    -- These changes, or outcomes, are usually expressed in terms of:
    -- -- knowledge and skills (these are often considered to be rather short-term outcomes)
    -- -- behaviors (these are often considered to be rather intermediate-term outcomes)
    -- -- values, conditions and status (these are often considered to be rather long-term outcomes)
  • Outcome targets
    These are the number and percent of participants that you want to achieve the outcome, for example, an outcome goal of 5,000 teens (10% of teens in Indianapolis) who quit smoking over the next year
  • Outcome indicators
    These are observable and measurable “milestones” toward an outcome target. These are what you'd see, hear, read, etc., that would indicate to you whether you're making any progress toward your outcome target or not,for example, the number and percent of teen participants who quit smoking right after the program and six months after the program -- these indicators give you a strong impression as to whether 5,000 teens will quit or not over the next year from completing your program.

NOTE: Take a few minutes and really notice the differences between:
-- Outputs (which indicate hardly anything about the changes in clients -- they're usually just numbers)
-- Outcomes (which indicate true changes in your clients)
-- Outcome targets (which specify how much of your outcome you hope to achieve)
-- Outcome indicators (which you can see, hear, read, etc. and suggest that you're making progress toward your outcome target or not)

Adapted from: Basic Guide to Outcomes-Based Evaluation for Nonprofit Organizations with Very Limited Resources, Written by Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC. Copyright 1997-2007.


Button reads: